Comments on: Moving from Atom 0.3 to 1.0 http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html about standards, webdesign, usability and open source Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:13:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: ju-hyun.blogspot.com http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-1304 ju-hyun.blogspot.com Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:10:00 +0000 #comment-1304 <a href='http://ju-hyun.blogspot.com/2007/09/rakaz-moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html'>rakaz - Moving from Atom 0.3 to 1.0</a>: rakaz - Moving from Atom 0.3 to 1.0 Blogged with Flock rakaz – Moving from Atom 0.3 to 1.0: rakaz – Moving from Atom 0.3 to 1.0 Blogged with Flock

]]> By: teahut.sakura.ne.jp http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-1206 teahut.sakura.ne.jp Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:59:59 +0000 #comment-1206 <a href='http://teahut.sakura.ne.jp/b/2007-03-29-1.html'>Atom 0.3 と 1.0 の相異点</a>: Atom 0.3 と 1.0 の相異点を見やすく示したサイトがなかったので，まと めておくことにしました．下が対応表になります (XPath で書いてありま す)．空白は，対応する要 Atom 0.3 と 1.0 の相異点: Atom 0.3 と 1.0 の相異点を見やすく示したサイトがなかったので，まと めておくことにしました．下が対応表になります (XPath で書いてありま す)．空白は，対応する要

]]> By: www.kaede-software.com http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-1189 www.kaede-software.com Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:47:46 +0000 #comment-1189 <a href='http://www.kaede-software.com/2007/02/atom_rss.html'>ATOM と RSS の 各要 ATOM と RSS の 各要

]]> By: porneL http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-999 porneL Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:39:16 +0000 #comment-999 I've written XSL stylesheets that allow conversion of Atom 0.3 to Atom 1.0 and then Atom 1.0 to RSS 2.0: http://atom.geeekhood.net/ I’ve written XSL stylesheets that allow conversion of Atom 0.3 to Atom 1.0 and then Atom 1.0 to RSS 2.0:

http://atom.geeekhood.net/

]]> By: Alex http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-965 Alex Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:39:26 +0000 #comment-965 If anyone ever figured out how to get Blogger to feed properly, I'd love to know how they did it... If anyone ever figured out how to get Blogger to feed properly, I’d love to know how they did it…

]]> By: Sam Ruby http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-1472 Sam Ruby Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:20:09 +0000 #comment-1472 That time has arrived. Where there previously was a general warning, you now get specific, element by element, and attribute by attribute indication of what needs to change to make your Atom feeds conform to RFC 4287. This is also helpful. The goal That time has arrived. Where there previously was a general warning, you now get specific, element by element, and attribute by attribute indication of what needs to change to make your Atom feeds conform to RFC 4287. This is also helpful. The goal

]]> By: Elliotte Rusty Harold http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-937 Elliotte Rusty Harold Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:37:12 +0000 #comment-937 I really don't think the namespace will change in future versions, depsite the lack of a version attribute. The current design of Atom 1.0 is to allow backwards compatible evolution in which new elements are ignored by older clients, without requiring each client to update itself immediately for every spec change. I really don’t think the namespace will change in future versions, depsite the lack of a version attribute. The current design of Atom 1.0 is to allow backwards compatible evolution in which new elements are ignored by older clients, without requiring each client to update itself immediately for every spec change.

]]> By: Sam Ruby http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-1468 Sam Ruby Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:48:26 +0000 #comment-1468 By my read, today is August 46th or thereabouts, which I guess qualifies as early August, so I’ve gone ahead and made the Feed Validator issue deprecation warnings whenever it encounters Atom 0.3 feeds ( example). No other code changes were mad By my read, today is August 46th or thereabouts, which I guess qualifies as early August, so I’ve gone ahead and made the Feed Validator issue deprecation warnings whenever it encounters Atom 0.3 feeds ( example). No other code changes were mad

]]> By: Mathias http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-850 Mathias Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:14:20 +0000 #comment-850 Nice overview. Thanks a lot! Nice overview. Thanks a lot!

]]> By: amk http://rakaz.nl/2005/07/moving-from-atom-03-to-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-828 amk Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:13:38 +0000 #comment-828 It seems to me that, in the final Atom draft, the 'feed' element doesn't have an 'id' attribute. Beyond that minor error, this was very helpful in updating my feed for 1.0. It seems to me that, in the final Atom draft, the ‘feed’ element doesn’t have an ‘id’ attribute. Beyond that minor error, this was very helpful in updating my feed for 1.0.

]]>